Sam Ryan Ziegann vs Shu Muto, Luan 2026, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 28 May

Final

Sam Ryan Ziegann

LostRank #8151.4763%

Muto won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 22–6

Shu Muto

WinnerRank #13542.5437%Upset

Venue

Nanshan Anhui Province Small Ball Training Base

Luan, CHN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

79 m

Low

Match stats

1h 19m

3Aces0

2Double faults0

25Service points won33

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

1/520%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted80%4/5

Head to head

0Ziegann

1Muto

1 meeting

LuanRound of 16 · 28 MayHardThis match
Shu Muto
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sam Ryan Ziegann vs Shu Muto, Luan 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research