Nathaniel Lammons vs Adrian Boitan, Chisinau Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 24 May

Final

Nathaniel Lammons

WinnerRank #1734

Lammons won in 3 sets · 2h 38m

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 23–6

Set 37–5

Adrian Boitan

LostRank #464

Venue

National Tennis Center of Moldova

Băcioi, MDA· Clay· Court 1

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

20 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

57%

Moderate

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

115 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

8Aces7

3Double faults12

47/8853%1st serve %56%66/117

38/4193%2nd serve %76%39/51

36/4777%1st serve points won65%43/66

25/4161%2nd serve points won51%26/51

5/771%Break points saved79%11/14

15Service games played15

Return

23/6635%1st serve return points23%11/47

25/5149%2nd serve return points39%16/41

3/1421%Break points converted29%2/7

15Return games played15

Points

108Total points won96

61Service points won69

47Receiver points won27

7Max points in a row7

Games

16Games won14

13Service games won12

3Max games in a row5

Lammons7

Boitan5

1501515301540154030

Lammons6

Boitan5

0151515301540154030

Lammons5

Boitan5

1501515153030304030404040A

Lammons5

Boitan4

150151530154015

Lammons4

Boitan4

1501515153030303040

Lammons4

Boitan3

01503004015403040404040A404040A4040A40

Lammons3

Boitan3

150151515301540

Lammons3

Boitan2

1501515153030304030

Lammons2

Boitan2

0151515301530304030404040A

Lammons2

Boitan1

150300400

Lammons1

Boitan1

150151515301540

Lammons1

Boitan0

15030040040154030

Head to head

1Lammons

0Boitan

1 meeting

Chisinau ChallengerQualifying R1 · 24 MayClayThis match
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Adrian Boitan
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Form and path

Nathaniel Lammons0–6

Guangzhou Huangpu CHHard

LQualifying R1
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 1
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 2
Nathaniel Lammons · Retired

Charlottesville CHHard

LQualifying R1
Gijs Brouwer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Mouilleron Le Captif CHHard

LQualifying R1
Mats Rosenkranz
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

Szczecin CHClay

LQualifying R1
Nicola Kuhn
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Nottingham CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Borna Gojo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁹Set 3: 6
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6²Set 2: 7¹¹Set 3: 4

Cherbourg CHHard

LRound of 32
Denis Istomin
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 4

Adrian Boitan

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nathaniel Lammons vs Adrian Boitan, Chisinau Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research