Taeha Jang vs SungMin Lee, Gimcheon 2026, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sun 17 May

Final

Taeha Jang

LostUnranked

Lee won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 25–7

SungMin Lee

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Gimcheon Sports Town Tennis Court

Gimcheon, KOR· Hard· Court 3

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

43%

Comfortable

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

95 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Jang

1Lee

1 meeting

GimcheonQualifying R1 · 17 MayHardThis match
SungMin Lee
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Taeha Jang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Form and path

Taeha Jang3–3

AndongHard

DaeguHard

AnseongHard

LQualifying R1
Jung Hoon Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Taeha Jang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

SungMin Lee

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Taeha Jang vs SungMin Lee, Gimcheon 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research