Breno Braga vs Valentino Conte, Maringa 2026, Qualifying R2

ITF M15 · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Tue 12 May

Final

Breno Braga

LostRank #1505

Conte won in 2 sets · 2h 6m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 22–6

Valentino Conte

WinnerRank #1658

Venue

Country Club de Maringá

Maringá, BRA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

22°C

Mild

Altitude

548 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 6m

0Aces0

4Double faults2

27Service points won38

10Service games played10

5Service games won8

10Return games played10

1/617%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted83%5/6

Head to head

0Braga

1Conte

1 meeting

MaringaQualifying R2 · 12 MayClayThis match
Valentino Conte
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Breno Braga
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Breno Braga vs Valentino Conte, Maringa 2026, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research