Espen Lagarde vs Daniel Verbeek, Monastir 2026, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sun 29 Mar

Final

Espen Lagarde

LostRank #1715

Verbeek won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 21–6

Daniel Verbeek

WinnerRank #1196

Venue

Magic Hotel Skanes Family Monastir

Sahline, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

69%

Moderate

Temperature

17°C

Mild

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Lagarde

1Verbeek

1 meeting

MonastirQualifying R1 · 29 MarHardThis match
Daniel Verbeek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Espen Lagarde
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 1

Form and path

Espen Lagarde2–3

Saint-DizierHard

LQualifying R1
Adan Freire Da Silva
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Espen Lagarde
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

KayseriHard

Daniel Verbeek

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Espen Lagarde vs Daniel Verbeek, Monastir 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research