Nicolas Parizzia vs Matthew William Donald, Altamura 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 27 Mar

Final

Nicolas Parizzia

LostRank #987

Donald won in 2 sets · 1h 1m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 21–6

Matthew William Donald

WinnerRank #348

Venue

Circolo Tennis Altamura

Altamura, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

406 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Moderate

Match stats

1h 1m

1Aces0

3Double faults2

22Service points won28

8Service games played7

3Service games won7

7Return games played8

3/838%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

0Parizzia

1Donald

1 meeting

AltamuraQuarterfinal · 27 MarHardThis match
Matthew William Donald
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nicolas Parizzia
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nicolas Parizzia vs Matthew William Donald, Altamura 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research