Egor Pleshivtsev vs Louis Larue, Maanshan 2026, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 26 Mar

Final

Egor Pleshivtsev

WinnerRank #7831.2475%

Pleshivtsev won in 2 sets · 1h 38m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–4

Louis Larue

LostRank #9573.6925%

Venue

ROGT Sports Event Center

Ma'anshan, CHN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

13 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 38m

1Aces1

4Double faults0

34Service points won26

9Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played9

6/967%Break points saved45%5/11

6/1155%Break points converted33%3/9

Head to head

1Pleshivtsev

0Larue

1 meeting

MaanshanRound of 16 · 26 MarHardThis match
Egor Pleshivtsev
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Louis Larue
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Egor Pleshivtsev vs Louis Larue, Maanshan 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research