Tomas Farjat vs Maximo Zeitune, Tigre Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 15 Feb

Final

Tomas Farjat

LostRank #7962.2443%

Zeitune won in 3 sets · 2h 6m

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–4

Set 35–7

Maximo Zeitune

WinnerRank #5111.6657%

Venue

Club Nautico Hacoaj - Sede Tigre

Tigre, ARG· Clay· Cancha Central

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

3 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

9Aces4

7Double faults3

56/9559%1st serve %66%66/100

32/3982%2nd serve %91%31/34

46/5682%1st serve points won73%48/66

15/3938%2nd serve points won53%18/34

4/757%Break points saved78%7/9

16Service games played16

Return

18/6627%1st serve return points18%10/56

16/3447%2nd serve return points62%24/39

2/922%Break points converted43%3/7

16Return games played16

Points

95Total points won100

61Service points won66

34Receiver points won34

6Max points in a row8

Games

15Games won17

13Service games won13

3Max games in a row3

Farjat5

Zeitune7

015030040

Farjat5

Zeitune6

150151515301540

Farjat5

Zeitune5

015030040154030404040A40

Farjat4

Zeitune5

015151515301540

Farjat4

Zeitune4

1501515301530304030

Farjat3

Zeitune4

01503004015403040

Farjat3

Zeitune3

150300400

Farjat2

Zeitune3

0151515301530303040404040A

Farjat2

Zeitune2

0150301530303040304040A40

Farjat1

Zeitune2

1503003015401540304040A40404040A

Farjat1

Zeitune1

0151515153030304030

Farjat0

Zeitune1

150151515301540

Head to head

1Farjat

2Zeitune

3 meetings

Tigre ChallengerQualifying R1 · 15 FebClayThis match
Maximo Zeitune
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Tomas Farjat
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
La PlataRound of 32 · 11 MarClay
Maximo Zeitune
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Farjat
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
SantiagoRound of 32 · 21 JanClay
Tomas Farjat
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Maximo Zeitune
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tomas Farjat vs Maximo Zeitune, Tigre Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Match research