Alex De Minaur vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Rotterdam 2026, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
Minaur won in 3 sets · 2h 44m
2–1
Set 13–6
Set 27–64
Set 37–5
Venue and conditions
Rotterdam AhoyRotterdam, NEDCentre Court
Indoor hardCourt speed1.6 vs last year100.1Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude4 mSea level
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
4Aces12
3Double faults8
67/10067%1st serve %58%70/120
30/3391%2nd serve %84%42/50
50/6775%1st serve points won74%52/70
18/3355%2nd serve points won48%24/50
5/771%Break points saved60%3/5
16Service games played17
Return
18/7026%1st serve return points25%17/67
26/5052%2nd serve return points45%15/33
2/540%Break points converted29%2/7
17Return games played16
Points
111Total points won108
68Service points won76
43Receiver points won32
5Max points in a row8
Games
17Games won17
13Service games won15
3Max games in a row3
1Tiebreaks0
Point by point
De Minaur7
Van De Zandschulp5
1501515301540154030
De Minaur6
Van De Zandschulp5
015151530154015
De Minaur5
Van De Zandschulp5
150151530154015
De Minaur4
Van De Zandschulp5
015030040
De Minaur4
Van De Zandschulp4
1501515301530304030
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp4
0151515153015403040
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp3
1501515301530304030
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp3
01503004015403040404040A
P3 · Ace
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp2
015030040
P1 · Double fault
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp1
1501515153015403040
P4 · Ace
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp0
15030030154015
De Minaur1
Van De Zandschulp0
0151515153030303040404040A4040A40
P3 · AceP4 · Double fault
De Minaur7
Van De Zandschulp6
1011122232425253636474
P7 · Double fault
De Minaur6
Van De Zandschulp6
0151515153030304030404040A
De Minaur6
Van De Zandschulp5
1503003015401540304040A40
P3 · Double fault
De Minaur5
Van De Zandschulp5
0151515153015403040404040A404040A404040A
P5 · Double fault
De Minaur5
Van De Zandschulp4
150151530154015
De Minaur4
Van De Zandschulp4
150300301530304030404040A404040A
P1 · Double faultP3 · AceP6 · Ace
De Minaur4
Van De Zandschulp3
015030153030303040404040A404040A4040A40
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp3
1501515153015403040
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp2
150300400
P3 · Ace
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp2
015151515301540
P2 · Double faultP3 · Ace
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp1
1503004004015
De Minaur1
Van De Zandschulp1
015151515301540
P2 · Double fault
De Minaur1
Van De Zandschulp0
150300400
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp6
0151515301530303040
De Minaur3
Van De Zandschulp5
1503004004015
P4 · Double fault
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp5
01503015301540
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp4
015030153015403040
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp3
0151515153030304030404040A
P5 · Double fault
De Minaur2
Van De Zandschulp2
1501515301540154030404040A4040A40
De Minaur1
Van De Zandschulp2
015030040
P3 · Ace
De Minaur1
Van De Zandschulp1
150300400
De Minaur0
Van De Zandschulp1
015151515301540
P2 · Double fault
Head to head
3Minaur
1Zandschulp
4 meetings- RotterdamQuarterfinal · 13 FebHardThis matchAlex De MinaurSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 5
- US OpenRound of 64 · 3 SeptHardBotic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Alex De MinaurSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5Set 3: 2
- DohaRound of 16 · 19 Feb 2025HardAlex De MinaurSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- Australian OpenRound of 128 · 14 Jan 2025HardAlex De MinaurSets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.