Vladislav Melnic vs Max Basing, Sheffield 2026, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 5 Feb

Final

Vladislav Melnic

WinnerRank #1055

Melnic won in 3 sets · 2h 39m

2–1

Set 13–6

Set 27–6⁴

Set 36–4

Max Basing

LostRank #256

Venue

Graves Tennis and Leisure Centre

Sheffield, GBR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

189 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 39m

7Aces3

6Double faults3

60Service points won65

15Service games played16

11Service games won12

16Return games played15

6/1060%Break points saved56%5/9

4/944%Break points converted40%4/10

Head to head

1Melnic

0Basing

1 meeting

SheffieldRound of 16 · 5 FebHardThis match
Vladislav Melnic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Max Basing
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vladislav Melnic vs Max Basing, Sheffield 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research