William Grant vs Braden Shick, Winston-Salem 2026, Semifinal
Final score
Final
2-6 6-4 6-2Venue and conditions
Wake Forest Tennis ComplexWinston-Salem, USACourt 1
Indoor hardCourt speed101.2Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude287 mLow
Match stats
2h 19m5Aces7
2Double faults0
51Service points won53
13Service games played13
9Service games won10
13Return games played13
9/1369%Break points saved70%7/10
3/1030%Break points converted31%4/13
Set statistics
Statistics unavailable
Point by point
Grant2
Shick6
1501515301540154030404040A
Grant2
Shick5
015030040
Grant2
Shick4
150300400
Grant1
Shick4
0151515301530304030404040A
Grant1
Shick3
150300400
Grant0
Shick3
150300301530304030404040A
Grant0
Shick2
0151515153015403040404040A
Grant0
Shick1
01503015301540
Grant4
Shick6
015030153015403040404040A
Grant4
Shick5
1501515153015403040
Grant4
Shick4
0151515301530303040
Grant4
Shick3
01515153015303040304040A40404040A
Grant4
Shick2
015030153030304030
Grant3
Shick2
0151515301540154030404040A404040A
Grant3
Shick1
15015151530154030404040A40
Grant2
Shick1
015030040
Grant2
Shick0
150151530154015
Grant1
Shick0
01515151530303040304040A40
Grant6
Shick2
0151515301530304030
Grant5
Shick2
1501515301530304030
Grant4
Shick2
150300400
Grant3
Shick2
015030153030304030
Grant2
Shick2
15015151530154030404040A404040A40
Grant1
Shick2
015030040
Grant1
Shick1
1503003015303030404040A40
Grant0
Shick1
150151515301540
Head to head
0Grant
1Shick
1 meeting- Winston-SalemSemifinal · 17 JanHardThis matchBraden ShickSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6William GrantSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.