Max Pade vs Noah Johnston, Orlando 2025, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Mon 10 Nov

Final

Max Pade

LostUnranked

Johnston won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 23–6

Noah Johnston

WinnerRank #1252

Venue

USTA National Campus

Orlando, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

64%

Moderate

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

33 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Pade

1Johnston

1 meeting

OrlandoQualifying R1 · 10 Nov 2025ClayThis match
Noah Johnston
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Max Pade
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Form and path

Max Pade1–2

MontrealHard

LQualifying R1
Aditya Vishal Balsekar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Max Pade
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

UeberlingenClay

Noah Johnston

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Max Pade vs Noah Johnston, Orlando 2025, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research