Matt Kuhar vs Daniel Milavsky, Trois-Rivières 2025, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 31 Oct

Final

Matt Kuhar

LostRank #7445.0219%

Milavsky won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Daniel Milavsky

WinnerRank #3191.1481%

Venue

Tennis 3R

Trois-Rivieres, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

9 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 30m

5Aces7

3Double faults1

36Service points won38

8Service games played9

5Service games won9

9Return games played8

4/757%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted43%3/7

Head to head

0Kuhar

1Milavsky

1 meeting

Trois-RivièresQuarterfinal · 31 Oct 2025HardThis match
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Matt Kuhar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matt Kuhar vs Daniel Milavsky, Trois-Rivières 2025, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research