Dane Sweeny vs Kai An Wu, Taipei 2025, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 28 Aug

Final

Dane Sweeny

WinnerRank #1121.0092%

Sweeny won in 2 sets · 1h 41m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–3

Kai An Wu

LostRank #193611.758%

Venue

Taipei Tennis Center

Taipei, TPE· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

34°C

Hot

Altitude

27 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 41m

0Aces0

3Double faults2

33Service points won33

8Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played8

1/333%Break points saved54%7/13

6/1346%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Sweeny

0Wu

1 meeting

TaipeiRound of 16 · 28 Aug 2025HardThis match
Dane Sweeny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kai An Wu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dane Sweeny vs Kai An Wu, Taipei 2025, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research