Amaury Raynel vs Arthur Nagel, Eupen 2025, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 7 Aug

Final

Amaury Raynel

LostRank #12271.6756%

Nagel won in 2 sets · 1h 21m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 22–6

Arthur Nagel

WinnerRank #3572.0844%Upset

Venue

KTC Eupen

Eupen, BEL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

61%

Moderate

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

284 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 21m

1Aces1

3Double faults2

18Service points won42

7Service games played8

3Service games won8

8Return games played7

1/520%Break points saved100%4/4

0/40%Break points converted80%4/5

Head to head

0Raynel

1Nagel

1 meeting

EupenRound of 16 · 7 Aug 2025ClayThis match
Arthur Nagel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Amaury Raynel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Amaury Raynel vs Arthur Nagel, Eupen 2025, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research