Matt Kleiman vs Dhruv Sharma, Brazzaville 2025, Qualifying R2

ITF M25 · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Mon 28 Jul

Final

Matt Kleiman

WinnerRank #1844

Kleiman won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Dhruv Sharma

LostUnranked

Venue

Pôle Tennis de Brazzaville

Brazzaville, CGO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

315 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

0Aces0

1Double faults5

34Service points won16

6Service games played7

6Service games won1

7Return games played6

3/3100%Break points saved33%3/9

6/967%Break points converted0%0/3

Head to head

1Kleiman

0Sharma

1 meeting

BrazzavilleQualifying R2 · 28 Jul 2025ClayThis match
Matt Kleiman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dhruv Sharma
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matt Kleiman vs Dhruv Sharma, Brazzaville 2025, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research