Jay Clarke vs Svyatoslav Gulin, Vic 2025, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 16 May

Final

Jay Clarke

WinnerRank #2391.6556%

Clarke won in 2 sets · 1h 56m

2–0

Set 17–6²

Set 26–3

Svyatoslav Gulin

LostRank #3942.1444%

Venue

Club Tennis Vic

Vic, ESP· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

516 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 56m

2Aces1

0Double faults3

45Service points won37

11Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played11

1/333%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Clarke

0Gulin

1 meeting

VicQuarterfinal · 16 May 2025ClayThis match
Jay Clarke
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Svyatoslav Gulin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jay Clarke vs Svyatoslav Gulin, Vic 2025, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research