Saveliy Ivanov vs Ali Yazdani, Tehran 2025, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 15 May

Final

Saveliy Ivanov

LostRank #983

Yazdani won in 2 sets · 1h 22m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 23–6

Ali Yazdani

WinnerRank #955

Venue

Enghelab Sports Complex

Tehran, IRI· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

24 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

25%

Dry

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

1594 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 22m

5Aces14

3Double faults2

31Service points won39

10Service games played11

8Service games won11

11Return games played10

3/560%Break points saved100%3/3

0/30%Break points converted40%2/5

Head to head

0Ivanov

1Yazdani

1 meeting

TehranRound of 16 · 15 May 2025ClayThis match
Ali Yazdani
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Saveliy Ivanov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Saveliy Ivanov vs Ali Yazdani, Tehran 2025, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research