Noah Schachter vs Daniel De Jonge, Sherbrooke 2025, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 7 Mar

Final

Noah Schachter

WinnerRank #1085

Schachter won in 2 sets · 1h 44m

2–0

Set 17–6²

Set 26–4

Daniel De Jonge

LostRank #571

Venue

Centre récréatif de Rock Forest

Sherbrooke, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

263 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 44m

9Aces6

2Double faults11

47Service points won46

11Service games played11

9Service games won8

11Return games played11

2/450%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Schachter

0Jonge

1 meeting

SherbrookeQuarterfinal · 7 Mar 2025HardThis match
Noah Schachter
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Daniel De Jonge
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Noah Schachter vs Daniel De Jonge, Sherbrooke 2025, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research