Stefan Popovic vs Arthur Nagel, Antalya 2025, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 20 Feb

Final

Stefan Popovic

LostRank #680

Nagel won in 2 sets · 1h 17m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 22–6

Arthur Nagel

WinnerRank #356

Venue

Megasaray Tennis Academy

Belek, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

31 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

36%

Comfortable

Temperature

12°C

Cool

Altitude

2 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 17m

0Aces1

1Double faults2

30Service points won38

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

5/956%Break points saved86%6/7

1/714%Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

0Popovic

1Nagel

1 meeting

AntalyaRound of 16 · 20 Feb 2025ClayThis match
Arthur Nagel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Stefan Popovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Stefan Popovic vs Arthur Nagel, Antalya 2025, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research