Vasile Antonescu vs Daniel De Jonge, Bucharest 2025, Qualifying R2

ITF M15 · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Mon 10 Feb

Final

Vasile Antonescu

LostRank #2033

Jonge won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 10–6

Set 20–6

Daniel De Jonge

WinnerRank #575

Venue

Centrul Național de Tenis Simona Halep

Bucharest, ROU· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

80 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Antonescu

1Jonge

1 meeting

BucharestQualifying R2 · 10 Feb 2025HardThis match
Daniel De Jonge
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vasile Antonescu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

Form and path

Vasile Antonescu3–2

BucharestThis week

WQualifying R1
Vasile Antonescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Eduard Gabriel Coreisa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

BuzauClay

ConstantaClay

Daniel De Jonge

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vasile Antonescu vs Daniel De Jonge, Bucharest 2025, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research