John Sperle vs Matej Dodig, Monastir 2024, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 22 Feb

Final

John Sperle

LostRank #660

Dodig won in 2 sets · 1h 40m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 21–6

Matej Dodig

WinnerRank #138

Venue

Magic Hotel Skanes Family Monastir

Sahline, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 40m

0Aces6

3Double faults1

38Service points won32

10Service games played9

4Service games won7

9Return games played10

5/1145%Break points saved33%1/3

2/367%Break points converted55%6/11

Head to head

0Sperle

1Dodig

1 meeting

MonastirRound of 16 · 22 Feb 2024HardThis match
Matej Dodig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
John Sperle
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

John Sperle vs Matej Dodig, Monastir 2024, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research