John Sperle vs Jan Kupcic, Monastir 2023, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 2 Nov

Final

John Sperle

WinnerRank #660

Sperle won in 2 sets · 1h 51m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 27–6⁷

Jan Kupcic

LostRank #974

Venue

Magic Hotel Skanes Family Monastir

Sahline, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

35 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

53%

Moderate

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 51m

2Aces1

1Double faults5

45Service points won40

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

3/475%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Sperle

0Kupcic

1 meeting

MonastirRound of 16 · 2 Nov 2023HardThis match
John Sperle
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁹
Jan Kupcic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁷

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

John Sperle vs Jan Kupcic, Monastir 2023, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research