Radu Albot vs Billy Harris, Bergamo Challenger 2023, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 1 Nov

Final

Radu Albot

LostRank #5611.8750%

Harris won in 3 sets · 1h 57m

1–2

Set 16–1

Set 23–6

Set 34–6

Billy Harris

WinnerRank #2521.8750%

Venue

PalaNorda

Bergamo, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

259 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 57m

5Aces16

2Double faults6

52Service points won52

13Service games played13

11Service games won11

13Return games played13

2/450%Break points saved75%6/8

2/825%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

0Albot

1Harris

1 meeting

Bergamo ChallengerRound of 16 · 1 Nov 2023HardThis match
Billy Harris
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Radu Albot
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Radu Albot vs Billy Harris, Bergamo Challenger 2023, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research