Clement Tabur vs Sandro Kopp, Pazardzhik 2023, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 29 Sept

Final

Clement Tabur

WinnerRank #158

Tabur won in 2 sets · 1h 16m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–1

Sandro Kopp

LostRank #308

Venue

Tennis Club Favorit

Pazardzhik, BUL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

52%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

209 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 16m

2Aces1

1Double faults2

30Service points won21

7Service games played6

7Service games won1

6Return games played7

1/1100%Break points saved29%2/7

5/771%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Tabur

0Kopp

1 meeting

PazardzhikQuarterfinal · 29 Sept 2023ClayThis match
Clement Tabur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Clement Tabur vs Sandro Kopp, Pazardzhik 2023, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research