Matthew Summers vs Tyler Stice, Budapest 2023, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 8 Sept

Final

Matthew Summers

LostRank #1234

Stice won in 3 sets · 2h 32m

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 25–7

Set 30–6

Tyler Stice

WinnerRank #1691

Venue

GS Tenisz Club

Budapest, HUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

106 m

Low

Match stats

2h 32m

1Aces0

2Double faults3

42Service points won55

14Service games played14

7Service games won10

14Return games played14

6/1346%Break points saved60%6/10

4/1040%Break points converted54%7/13

Head to head

0Summers

1Stice

1 meeting

BudapestQuarterfinal · 8 Sept 2023ClayThis match
Tyler Stice
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Matthew Summers
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matthew Summers vs Tyler Stice, Budapest 2023, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research