Peter Heller vs Daniel Siniakov, Telfs 2023, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 21 Jul

Final

Peter Heller

WinnerRank #13941.2575%

Heller won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Daniel Siniakov

LostRank #5193.6525%

Venue

Tennisclub Telfs

Telfs, AUT· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

663 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 4m

1Aces0

0Double faults8

25Service points won12

6Service games played7

5Service games won0

7Return games played6

0/10%Break points saved36%4/11

7/1164%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

1Heller

0Siniakov

1 meeting

TelfsQuarterfinal · 21 Jul 2023ClayThis match
Peter Heller
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Siniakov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Heller vs Daniel Siniakov, Telfs 2023, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research