Matas Vasiliauskas vs Marek Nano, Trnava 2023, Qualifying R1

ITF M25 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Mon 27 Mar

Final

Matas Vasiliauskas

LostRank #1512

Nano won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 21–6

Marek Nano

WinnerUnranked

Venue

TC Empire

Trnava, SVK· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

148 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Vasiliauskas

1Nano

1 meeting

TrnavaQualifying R1 · 27 Mar 2023HardThis match
Marek Nano
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Matas Vasiliauskas
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 1

Form and path

Matas Vasiliauskas

No recent matches recorded.

Marek Nano1–2

TrnavaClay

LQualifying R1
Michal Novansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marek Nano
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

TrnavaClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matas Vasiliauskas vs Marek Nano, Trnava 2023, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research