Timo Stodder vs Andrej Nedic, Opatija 2023, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 24 Mar

Final

Timo Stodder

WinnerRank #12371.1581%

Stodder won in 2 sets · 1h 9m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Andrej Nedic

LostRank #2354.9219%

Venue

Tennis Club Opatija

Opatija, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

79%

Humid

Temperature

15°C

Mild

Altitude

58 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 9m

2Aces1

1Double faults1

39Service points won22

9Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played9

3/475%Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Stodder

0Nedic

1 meeting

OpatijaQuarterfinal · 24 Mar 2023ClayThis match
Timo Stodder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Andrej Nedic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Timo Stodder vs Andrej Nedic, Opatija 2023, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research