Jules Marie vs Clement Chidekh, Loughborough 2023, Semifinal

ITF M25 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 14 Jan

Final

Jules Marie

LostRank #21381.7453%

Chidekh won in 2 sets · 1h 11m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 22–6

Clement Chidekh

WinnerRank #1341.9847%Upset

Venue

Dan Maskell Tennis Centre

Loughborough, GBR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

51 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 11m

2Aces0

1Double faults0

19Service points won36

9Service games played9

4Service games won7

9Return games played9

1/617%Break points saved33%1/3

2/367%Break points converted83%5/6

Head to head

0Marie

1Chidekh

1 meeting

LoughboroughSemifinal · 14 Jan 2023HardThis match
Clement Chidekh
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jules Marie
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jules Marie vs Clement Chidekh, Loughborough 2023, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research