Dayne Kelly vs Kyle Seelig, Traralgon 2022, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 18 Nov

Final

Dayne Kelly

LostRank #1822

Seelig won in 2 sets · 1h 38m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Kyle Seelig

WinnerRank #1912

Venue

Traralgon Tennis Association

Traralgon, AUS· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

74%

Humid

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

38 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 38m

4Aces1

2Double faults0

40Service points won38

9Service games played9

6Service games won9

9Return games played9

4/757%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted43%3/7

Head to head

0Kelly

1Seelig

1 meeting

TraralgonQuarterfinal · 18 Nov 2022HardThis match
Kyle Seelig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dayne Kelly
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dayne Kelly vs Kyle Seelig, Traralgon 2022, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research