Peter Bertran vs Gustavo Heide, Manizales 2022, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 8 Oct

Final

Peter Bertran

LostRank #945

Heide won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 24–6

Gustavo Heide

WinnerRank #114

Venue

Liga Caldense de Tenis, Palogrande

Manizales, COL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

7 km/h

Light

Humidity

93%

Very humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

2140 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Match stats

3Aces10

4Double faults2

44Service points won50

11Service games played11

9Service games won11

11Return games played11

5/771%Break points saved100%6/6

0/60%Break points converted29%2/7

Head to head

0Bertran

1Heide

1 meeting

ManizalesSemifinal · 8 Oct 2022ClayThis match
Gustavo Heide
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Peter Bertran
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Bertran vs Gustavo Heide, Manizales 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research