Tim Sandkaulen vs Sam Riffice, Memphis 2022, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 19 Aug

Final

Tim Sandkaulen

LostRank #1694

Riffice won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 22–6

Sam Riffice

WinnerRank #698

Venue

Snowden Grove Tennis Center

Southaven, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

113 m

Low

Match stats

1h 23m

5Aces4

0Double faults1

35Service points won38

9Service games played9

6Service games won9

9Return games played9

1/425%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

0Sandkaulen

1Riffice

1 meeting

MemphisQuarterfinal · 19 Aug 2022HardThis match
Sam Riffice
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tim Sandkaulen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Sandkaulen vs Sam Riffice, Memphis 2022, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research