Eero Vasa vs Fermin Tenti, Parnu 2022, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 6 Aug

Final

Eero Vasa

LostRank #4731.9049%

Tenti won in 3 sets · 2h 3m

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 21–6

Set 34–6

Fermin Tenti

WinnerRank #8651.8051%

Venue

Pärnu Kesklinna Tennis Club

Pärnu, EST· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

13 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 3m

4Aces0

2Double faults3

49Service points won65

13Service games played14

9Service games won12

14Return games played13

3/743%Break points saved83%10/12

2/1217%Break points converted57%4/7

Head to head

0Vasa

1Tenti

1 meeting

ParnuSemifinal · 6 Aug 2022ClayThis match
Fermin Tenti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eero Vasa
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Eero Vasa vs Fermin Tenti, Parnu 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research