Dan Martin vs Xiaofei Wang, Monastir 2022, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 24 Jun

Final

Dan Martin

LostRank #652

Wang won in 2 sets · 1h 51m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 22–6

Xiaofei Wang

WinnerRank #1569

Venue

Magic Hotel Skanes Family Monastir

Sahline, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

57%

Moderate

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 51m

3Aces5

2Double faults5

37Service points won43

10Service games played10

6Service games won9

10Return games played10

3/743%Break points saved86%6/7

1/714%Break points converted57%4/7

Head to head

0Martin

1Wang

1 meeting

MonastirQuarterfinal · 24 Jun 2022HardThis match
Xiaofei Wang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Dan Martin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dan Martin vs Xiaofei Wang, Monastir 2022, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research