Rimpei Kawakami vs Raphael Collignon, Brcko 2022, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 28 May

Final

Rimpei Kawakami

LostRank #1412

Collignon won in 2 sets · 1h 15m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 23–6

Raphael Collignon

WinnerRank #55

Venue

Tennis Club Prohema

Brčko, BIH· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

79%

Humid

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

90 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 15m

1Aces2

2Double faults6

13Service points won28

8Service games played8

1Service games won5

8Return games played8

5/1242%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted58%7/12

Head to head

0Kawakami

1Collignon

1 meeting

BrckoSemifinal · 28 May 2022ClayThis match
Raphael Collignon
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Rimpei Kawakami
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rimpei Kawakami vs Raphael Collignon, Brcko 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research