Marco Miceli vs Manuel Mazza, Cairo 2022, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 14 May

Final

Marco Miceli

WinnerRank #17381.5958%

Miceli won in 2 sets · 1h 37m

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–4

Manuel Mazza

LostRank #6302.2142%

Venue

Al-Solaimaneyah Tennis Center

Cairo, EGY· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

31 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

47%

Comfortable

Temperature

32°C

Hot

Altitude

90 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 37m

0Aces7

5Double faults2

32Service points won34

11Service games played11

6Service games won4

11Return games played11

3/838%Break points saved36%4/11

7/1164%Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

1Miceli

0Mazza

1 meeting

CairoSemifinal · 14 May 2022HardThis match
Marco Miceli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Manuel Mazza
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marco Miceli vs Manuel Mazza, Cairo 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research