Yanki Erel vs Mathys Erhard, Antalya 2022, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 16 Apr

Final

Yanki Erel

LostRank #3001.8051%

Erhard won in 2 sets · 1h 13m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 22–6

Mathys Erhard

WinnerRank #3731.8949%Upset

Venue

Megasaray Tennis Academy

Belek, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

65%

Moderate

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

2 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 13m

0Aces2

3Double faults0

25Service points won28

8Service games played7

2Service games won6

7Return games played8

5/1145%Break points saved83%5/6

1/617%Break points converted55%6/11

Head to head

0Erel

1Erhard

1 meeting

AntalyaSemifinal · 16 Apr 2022ClayThis match
Mathys Erhard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Yanki Erel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Yanki Erel vs Mathys Erhard, Antalya 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research