Timo Stodder vs Hamad Medjedovic, Antalya 2022, Final

ITF M15 · Final · Clay · Sun 3 Apr

Final

Timo Stodder

LostRank #12372.0246%

Medjedovic won in 2 sets · 1h 0m

0–2

Set 10–6

Set 21–6

Hamad Medjedovic

WinnerRank #781.7054%

Venue

Megasaray Tennis Academy

Belek, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

2 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 0m

1Aces2

3Double faults0

15Service points won29

6Service games played7

1Service games won7

7Return games played6

7/1258%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted42%5/12

Head to head

0Stodder

1Medjedovic

1 meeting

AntalyaFinal · 3 Apr 2022ClayThis match
Hamad Medjedovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Timo Stodder
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Timo Stodder vs Hamad Medjedovic, Antalya 2022, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research