Tim Van Rijthoven vs Nuno Borges, Forli 4 Challenger 2022, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 19 Feb

Final

Tim Van Rijthoven

WinnerRank #871

Rijthoven won in 2 sets · 1h 10m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–2

Nuno Borges

LostRank #53

Venue

Tennis Villa Carpena

Forli, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

38 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 10m

16Aces0

1Double faults0

38Service points won35

9Service games played9

9Service games won6

9Return games played9

0/0Break points saved40%2/5

3/560%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Rijthoven

0Borges

1 meeting

Forli 4 ChallengerSemifinal · 19 Feb 2022HardThis match
Tim Van Rijthoven
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nuno Borges
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Van Rijthoven vs Nuno Borges, Forli 4 Challenger 2022, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research