Eduardo Nava vs Jakob Schnaitter, Ithaca 2021, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 7 Oct

Final

Eduardo Nava

WinnerRank #16741.8350%

Nava won in 3 sets · 2h 22m

2–1

Set 16–1

Set 21–6

Set 37–6⁸

Jakob Schnaitter

LostRank #17821.8650%

Venue

Reis Tennis Center

Ithaca, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

282 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 22m

8Aces6

13Double faults4

64Service points won56

13Service games played13

11Service games won11

13Return games played13

7/978%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted22%2/9

Head to head

1Nava

0Schnaitter

1 meeting

IthacaRound of 16 · 7 Oct 2021HardThis match
Eduardo Nava
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7¹⁰
Jakob Schnaitter
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁸

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Eduardo Nava vs Jakob Schnaitter, Ithaca 2021, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research