Otto Virtanen vs Oscar Moraing, Jonkoping 2021, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 22 Sept

Final

Otto Virtanen

WinnerRank #121

Virtanen won in 3 sets · 1h 34m

2–1

Set 11–6

Set 26–4

Set 36–2

Oscar Moraing

LostRank #1746

Venue

Racketcentrum Jönköping

Jönköping, SWE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

113 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 34m

14Aces1

3Double faults0

51Service points won45

13Service games played12

10Service games won9

12Return games played13

3/650%Break points saved40%2/5

3/560%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Virtanen

0Moraing

1 meeting

JonkopingRound of 16 · 22 Sept 2021ClayThis match
Otto Virtanen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Oscar Moraing
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Otto Virtanen vs Oscar Moraing, Jonkoping 2021, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research