Corentin Denolly vs Adrian Boitan, Pitesti 2021, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 6 Aug

Final

Corentin Denolly

LostRank #530

Boitan won in 2 sets · 1h 24m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 23–6

Adrian Boitan

WinnerRank #464

Venue

CS Comesad

Pitesti, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

60%

Moderate

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

299 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 24m

0Aces4

2Double faults2

20Service points won36

8Service games played8

3Service games won7

8Return games played8

3/838%Break points saved89%8/9

1/911%Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

0Denolly

1Boitan

1 meeting

PitestiQuarterfinal · 6 Aug 2021ClayThis match
Adrian Boitan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Corentin Denolly
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Corentin Denolly vs Adrian Boitan, Pitesti 2021, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research