Naoki Nakagawa vs Joshua Peck, Champaign 2021, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 30 Jul

Final

Naoki Nakagawa

WinnerRank #667

Nakagawa won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–1

Joshua Peck

LostRank #1232

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

231 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 23m

8Aces0

3Double faults2

33Service points won25

8Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played8

1/1100%Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Nakagawa

0Peck

1 meeting

ChampaignQuarterfinal · 30 Jul 2021HardThis match
Naoki Nakagawa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Joshua Peck
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Naoki Nakagawa vs Joshua Peck, Champaign 2021, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research