Jason Kubler vs Sam Riffice, Tulsa 2021, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 17 Jun

Final

Jason Kubler

LostRank #5671.6855%

Riffice won in 2 sets · 1h 10m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Sam Riffice

WinnerRank #6982.0545%Upset

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

58%

Moderate

Temperature

37°C

Hot

Altitude

188 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 10m

5Aces3

2Double faults4

26Service points won34

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

2/633%Break points saved80%4/5

1/520%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Kubler

1Riffice

1 meeting

TulsaRound of 16 · 17 Jun 2021HardThis match
Sam Riffice
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jason Kubler
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jason Kubler vs Sam Riffice, Tulsa 2021, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research