Pascal Meis vs Dan Alexandru Tomescu, Genova 2021, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Mon 14 Jun

Final

Pascal Meis

WinnerRank #1386

Meis won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–4

Dan Alexandru Tomescu

LostRank #1055

Venue

Park Tennis Club Genova

Genoa, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

29 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Meis

0Tomescu

1 meeting

GenovaQualifying R1 · 14 Jun 2021ClayThis match
Pascal Meis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Form and path

Pascal Meis1–2

RicanyClay

LRound of 32
Niels Lootsma
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Pascal Meis
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

SevilleClay

Dan Alexandru Tomescu

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pascal Meis vs Dan Alexandru Tomescu, Genova 2021, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research