Tobias Simon vs Benjamin Lock, Gaiba 2021, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 11 Jun

Final

Tobias Simon

LostRank #14721.6656%

Lock won in 2 sets · 1h 8m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Benjamin Lock

WinnerRank #10752.0844%Upset

Venue

Tennis Club Gaiba

Gaiba, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

64%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 8m

6Aces8

5Double faults1

24Service points won37

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

2/633%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Simon

1Lock

1 meeting

GaibaQuarterfinal · 11 Jun 2021ClayThis match
Benjamin Lock
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tobias Simon
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tobias Simon vs Benjamin Lock, Gaiba 2021, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research