Nick Hardt vs Jakub Paul, Sharm ElSheikh 2021, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 5 Mar

Final

Nick Hardt

WinnerRank #307

Hardt won in 2 sets · 1h 29m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Jakub Paul

LostRank #993

Venue

SOHO Racket Center

Sharm ElSheikh, EGY· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

38 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

45%

Comfortable

Temperature

22°C

Warm

Altitude

36 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 29m

0Aces1

3Double faults2

37Service points won25

9Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played9

5/863%Break points saved33%3/9

6/967%Break points converted38%3/8

Head to head

1Hardt

0Paul

1 meeting

Sharm ElSheikhQuarterfinal · 5 Mar 2021HardThis match
Nick Hardt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jakub Paul
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nick Hardt vs Jakub Paul, Sharm ElSheikh 2021, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research