Taro Daniel vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Hamburg Challenger 2020, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 31 Oct

Walkover

Taro Daniel

WinnerRank #177

Daniel advanced · Walkover

Botic Van De Zandschulp

LostRank #37

Venue

Hamburger Tennis-Verband (Horn)

Hamburg, GER· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

16 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Daniel

1Zandschulp

1 meeting

Hamburg ChallengerSemifinal · 31 Oct 2020HardThis match
Taro Daniel
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Botic Van De Zandschulp · Walkover
BastadRound of 32 · 14 JulClay
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Taro Daniel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁰Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Taro Daniel vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Hamburg Challenger 2020, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research