Pedro Araujo vs Igor Smilansky, Setubal 2020, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sun 4 Oct

Final

Pedro Araujo

WinnerRank #1267

Araujo won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–4

Igor Smilansky

LostRank #1494

Venue

Clube de Ténis de Setúbal

Setúbal, POR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

22°C

Mild

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Araujo

0Smilansky

1 meeting

SetubalQualifying R1 · 4 Oct 2020HardThis match
Pedro Araujo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Igor Smilansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Form and path

Pedro Araujo

No recent matches recorded.

Igor Smilansky3–3

PortoHard

LQualifying R1
Leopold Zima
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 10
Igor Smilansky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 8

SajurHard

AkkoHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pedro Araujo vs Igor Smilansky, Setubal 2020, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research